Town of Warner –Planning Board

Meeting Minutes

September 13, 2010      7:00 PM

Warner Town Hall , Main Hall  


Members Present:     Barbara Annis, Paul Violette, Dan Watts, Ed Mical, and David                                        Hartman

Members Excused:    Rick Davies and Hank Duhamel

Members Absent: None       

Members Arriving Late: None

Alternates Present:    J.D. Colcord, Peter Wyman, and Aedan Sherman.

Alternates Excused:  None

Alternates Arriving Late: None  

OPEN MEETING AT 7:00 PM

ROLL CALL  

Barbara Annis opened the meeting at 7:00 PM . The roll call was taken. Barbara Annis elevated Peter Wyman and J.D. Colcord to voting Board members.  

1. MINUTES  

Approve minutes of August 2, 2010

Approve minutes of August 16, 2010 Work Session  

Barbara Annis noticed a typographical error in the August 2, 2010 meeting minutes.  

Ed Mical made a MOTION to APPROVE August 2, 2010 meeting minutes as amended. Paul Violette seconded the motion all were in favor. August 2, 2010 meeting minutes were APPROVED AS AMENDED.  

Paul Violette made a MOTION to APPROVE August 16, 2010 Work Session minutes. Peter Wyman seconded the motion and all were in favor. August 16, 2010 Work Session minutes were APPROVED.  

2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP)  

A. Presentation to Planning Board  

Ed Mical said he feels that the 2011-2016 CIP has been taken to the next step. He explained a few things were added to the overview, pictures of some of the projects, a chart of Direct Expenditures for Capital projects and Capital Reserve Funds from 2005 through 2010 has been added, as well as changing the format in the first few pages which includes the following section:

            The CIP serves as a source of information used:  

  • To provide the Town with a guide to be used by the Budget Committee and the Board of Selectmen during their annual budgeting process;
  • To aid the Town’s elected officials, appointed committees and department heads in the prioritization, coordination and sequencing of various municipal improvements;
  • To provide a forward looking planning tool for the purpose of contributing to the creation of a stable real property tax rate;
  • To inform the residents, business owners and developers of needed and planned improvements.

Ed Mical said one thing that should be considered when looking at Capital Improvement Projects is the Master Plan. The CIP is supposed to be tied into the Master Plan; items are identified in the Master Plan and at the time the CIP Subcommittee reviews the projects the Master Plan is used as part of the ranking system. The Master Plan has not necessarily been used in making the decision because of the fact that the Master Plan is currently in the process of being updated. Ed Mical said once the Master Plan is updated then it should be used as a tool for the CIP process.  

Ed Mical said he would like to recognize the CIP Subcommittee: Aedan Sherman, Peter Wyman, David Karrick (Selectman), Laura Buono (Town Administrator), Martha Bodnarik (Budget Committee) and Jeanne Hand (Public Member). All but Aedan Sherman have served on the CIP Subcommittee for the past two years.  

Ed Mical said there was a meeting in the very beginning, before the paperwork was sent out; three meetings were scheduled after of which only two meetings were held. There was considerable discussion on some of the project items.  

Ed Mical said he would like to make a couple changes to the Draft copy before it went to the Public Hearing. The Board agreed to allow the changes before going to the Public Hearing. The changes are as follows:  

            1. A line was deleted from the justification regarding the replacement furnace because it did not go with the project.

            2. The original request for the granite steps was for $20,000 based on a rough proposal of two years ago, however at the end of last week a new estimate was received for $11,000. A request was made to change the amount to $11,000                  based on the updated information. A photo of the front steps is included in the CIP.

            3. Ed Mical would also like to add a statement regarding the cost of the new fire truck purchased in 2010 at the end of page 24 titled Capital Reserves under indebtedness.  

Barbara Annis asked the Board if they had any questions or comments.  

J.D. Colcord asked why the Library is included in the CIP since it has its own budget that the Town is not in control of. Ed Mical said that question was raised during a CIP meeting and the committee members agreed the projects did fall under the CIP criteria.  

J.D. Colcord asked what the yearly Town allocations to the Library are, based on the new revaluation. The exact figures were not known at this time.  

David Hartman asked why there was a section for just the 2011 recommended projects and not for the entire five year period. Ed Mical explained that is just a quick glance to use as a tool for the Budget Committee and Selectmen as to the priority of the projects. Ed Mical read RSA 674:6  

            Purpose and Description: “The capital improvements program shall classify        projects according to the urgency and need for realization and shall recommend a time sequence for their implementation. The program may also contain the             estimated cost of each project and indicate probable operating and maintenance            costs and probable revenues, if any, as well as existing sources of funds or the         need for additional sources of funds for the implementation and operation of each   project. The program shall be based on information submitted by the departments          and agencies of the municipality and shall take into account public facility      needs   indicated by the prospective development shown in the master plan of the municipality or as permitted by other municipal land use controls.”  

It was explained that although the CIP Subcommittee makes recommendations it is still the Selectman’s final decision.  

David Hartman said that he would accept it as a recommendation from the Planning Board on The Capital Improvements Program.  

Barbara Annis said personally she feels it is a tool to show an overview of how the entire individual budgets will add up giving a broader view of the Town’s needs. She does not feel it is intending to tell the Selectmen what to do.  

J.D. Colcord said he felt that 2.5 million dollars for a fire station was too much. He asked if that was anywhere close to what an estimate of the cost might be. He used the Highway garage as an example costing around $300,000 that could hold the fire departments vehicles. He said he could not understand how the cost could be so high for a fire station.  

Ed Mical said that number was based on the cost of another fire station built recently outside of Warner’s area. The amount was based on the square footage that will be needed.  

Dan Watts said the fire station is essentially a house not just a garage.  

Ed Mical agreed and said that a portion of it is for storage but then there are living quarters, a kitchen and sleeping quarters. He said the amount may be high but that is what was submitted. Ed Mical said that at the Selectmen’s meeting today the Selectmen authorized the collection of information to get a better idea of the price.  

Paul Violette said it is a ballpark figure and not an engineering estimate. Ed Mical said that is correct.  

David Hartman said that the Selectmen have been trying to keep a handle on the Fire Departments request to get a new fire station. He said the Selectmen, at the meeting today, did authorize the appropriation of up to $8,000 to hire an architectural firm to develop a scope of what Warner is going to shoot for and develop a cost estimate of what it would be as of today. He said he is not sure if 2.5 million dollars is an accurate figure; however, it is a Capital Improvements Project.  

Barbara Annis said where the Pillsbury Free Library is self sufficient the Town has to give them 1/15 of 1% in order for them to operate; they are under Town funds but we do not have anything to say about how or when they spend their money so she is wondering if they should be listed in the Expenditures Chart below along with the Warner Water Village District. At this time it is included in the chart with what the Town spends. Ed Mical said when the addition was built the library came to the Town and it was a Town expenditure as a Capital Improvements projects and not under their operating budget.  

David Hartman asked if the project amounts included in the 2011-2016 CIP were in addition to the budget. Ed Mical said yes that was the request. Ed Mical said if it was not put in as a Capital Project or not recommended by the subcommittee it would not appear in the CIP.  

Barbara Annis said the Planning Board spent a lot of time discussing Exit 9 and the funds for the Exit 9 project. An estimate was received for $20,000-$30,000 for the comprehensive study that they wanted to have done. The Planning Board came up with the minimum of $10,000 request to make a total of $20,000 in Capital Reserve Fund; however, the CIP subcommittee is only recommending $5,000 so there will not be enough funds for the study. Barbara Annis said that was disappointing. She also said that the RFP/RFQ deadline is September 20, 2010 .  

Ed Mical said that another item talked about being a separate entity but not directly being involved with the Town is the Kearsarge Regional School District . There are no projects listed under the School District at this time because there budget process is just starting and they are not ready in September for the CIP. The School Board and the Budget Committee do not meet until September/October so their time frame to get a request would be late November or early December. Ed Mical said the CIP Subcommittee made a recommendation that an addendum could be put into the CIP to show what the District was looking to do around December time frame.  

There were no further questions or comments from the Board.  

B. Open Public Hearing on CIP  

Barbara Annis opened the Public Hearing.  

Jeanne Hand said she is a member of the ADHAWK committee for what to do with the SAU building and the old Middle School. She said different plans are being looked at which would be a Capital Expenditure. She talked about the prior $600,000 warrant from two years ago. The School District was able to get money to move the SAU employees from the old building to a wing between the old Middle School and the New London Outing Club as well as paying for the improvements. She said the idea of the warrant was the building was going to be sold and the money left over from the sale would go to relocate the employees. Jeanne Hand said the facilities committee of the ADHAWK committee is looking up a cost analysis on what to do. They are planning to meet again in two weeks. She said the idea was when the new Middle School was built the old building would be leased. She said the School District is back to square one with no money. They will need to somehow get the money back into the “pot” that they spent on moving the SAU employees. She said they are discussing making a skateboard park on Main Street . It was agreed to go along with that deal is the developer tears down the current building ($30,000 estimate). She said the obligation of the skateboard committee is to pay $30,000 to tear down the building but that still leaves the basement there. She said it is a very complicated issue. She said she was trying to make everyone aware that these issues will be passed onto the tax payers as a warrant article.  

Nancy Ladd said they were given a small estimate based on the probable new evaluation that the Library’s allocation would go down $3,500-$7,500 compared to last year. She said the 1/15 of 1% funds that come from the Town will be less in 2011 than they were for 2010 because the evaluation of the Town is less. Nancy Ladd said this coming year might be very tight for them because they spent their reserves this year on fixing the roof and masonry repairs. They decided to spend some of the trust funds on collections and programs so they could spend some of the accumulative money and tax money on the costly repairs. She said they also did some insulating work for long term savings of energy costs. Nancy Ladd said the requests the CIP subcommittee recommended is for insulating the ceiling of the old space to help with the energy costs. She said the percent they are automatically given from the Town was designed for operating costs. The money that they were able to accumulate over time from those funds is how they were able to do the repair work but they have pretty much bottomed out. Nancy Ladd said there are some drainage issues that need to be addressed as well as the meeting room downstairs that has not been renovated at this time. They are requesting the money from the CIP to help lower the operating budget cost in the long run by saving on energy costs.  

Dan Watts suggested the Library keep records of the amount of fuel used to see how much is actually reduced. Nancy Ladd said they are currently doing that. She said the amount of fuel used based on the degree day went down by 7% and the amount of gallons went down by 25% since they insulated the new building.  

Jim McLaughlin said he would like to commend the committee for having the CIP put together so well at this time.  

With no further comments or questions Barbara Annis closed the Public Hearing and Re-opened the Board’s discussion.  

C. Close Public Hearing and Reopen Discussion      

Barbara Annis said the Board will need to come up with their review/comments to be included in the CIP.  

J.D. Colcord asked what happens if they do not agree with the recommendations of the CIP subcommittee. Ed Mical said this is the time the Planning Board can say if they agree or not.  

Paul Violette said he was not sure if he would recommend any changes since he did not sit in on the whole process. He feels the CIP subcommittee had taken everything into consideration.

Barbara Annis said she realizes it is a difficult year but she feels the Town needs to look long range planning. She said even if a small amount is put in over a few years the amount will compound. She used the Conservation Committee request as an example that $50,000 is a lot of money to ask for but maybe a smaller amount could be added each year to accumulate some money for the future. She said that at this time it is safe since most of the land if not all of it is located on a Class VI road which no one could afford to upgrade a Class VI road to a Class V at this time.  

A brief discussion was held regarding whether the Library should be part of the CIP since it is a separate entity. A suggestion was made that the projects could be made as a request to the Selectmen from the Library Trustees or as a petition warrant article to the Town. It was understood that exceptions were made in the past by the Selectman for the Water Precinct.  

Peter Wyman made a MOTION to REDUCE the cost of the granite steps repair from $20,000 to $11,000. J.D. Colcord seconded the MOTION. All were in favor.  

David Hartman said the Library is not the same as the Water precinct that has its own taxing authority where the Library does not have its own taxing authority. J.D. Colcord said it does its own budget and the voters have no say in what they do with that budget. David Hartman said he did not understand why the Library requests were in the CIP as an immediate urgent need for this year’s budget request. A short discussion was held whether the projects belong in the CIP. 

J.D. Colcord made MOTION to remove the Library requests from the 2011-2016 CIP and recommended the Library either forward their requests to the Selectmen to have it placed into the Town budget or submit it as a warrant article. David Hartman seconded the MOTION.  

Dan Watts said that many of the projects in the CIP are going to end up as warrant articles and he does not understand why this is any different from those. He used the lawn mower request from Parks and Recreation as an example. There was another discussion held regarding the Library having their own operating budget. Dan Watts said he does not feel it is an operating budget expense but rather a CIP request.  

Ed Mical said that the criteria is the item has a dollar value of at least $10,000 and a useful life expectancy of three (3) years or greater.  

The Board all agreed with the requests but were questioning whether the request belong in the CIP or not since they are a separate entity and the Town has no control over there budget.  

Nancy Ladd asked if she could comment on the issues raised. Barbara Annis said yes.

Nancy Ladd said the Libraries in New Hampshire are considered a Department of the Town. The money allocated by the Town is controlled by the Trustees who are elected by the taxpayers in the Town. She said the CIP is a tool to see the big picture of where the needs are for the entire Town over a period of time. She said the operating funds from a town go towards running the services of the library as well as the interior building but that does not include the exterior of the building. The building and the land belong to the Town of Warner and they have been using the operating fund in the past for landscaping and exterior maintenance that technically as far as the information obtained from the Attorney General Office does not need to be used for exterior repairs. Nancy Ladd said they have spent money from warrant articles in the past responsibly.  

A vote was taken on the Motion to remove the Library requests from the CIP:  

Dan Watts-No; Paul Violette-No; Ed Mical-No; David Hartman-Yes; Peter Wyman-No; J.D. Colcord-Yes.  

The MOTION to remove the Library requests from the CIP was not passed,  

David Hartman made a MOTION to APPROVE the 2011-2016 CIP as presented with the additional changes discussed. Peter Wyman seconded the MOTION. All were in favor.  

Paul Violette suggested that any large requests such as the fire station request should be placed in the CIP early on to have time to accumulate enough funds. Ed Mical said the fire station has been included in the CIP for the past couple of years.  

Paul Violette made a MOTION to continue discussion on the Planning Board’s comments of the CIP later in the meeting to allow Vanessa Goold to present the Master Plan update. The MOTION was seconded and all were in favor.  

4. MASTER PLAN UPDATE  

A. Community Vision Chapter  

Vanessa Goold explained the Community Vision Chapter had been initially developed about a year ago. She said she wanted to bring the Chapter before the Board to review and finalize it. She asked if there were any comments.  

Vanessa Goold said she wanted to revisit the Business and Commercial Development as well as Residential Development sections of the Chapter to be sure they reflected what the Board wanted in terms of the Vision of Warner.  

The Business and Commercial Development section talks about expansion of the commercial zones as well as in the Exit 9 area based on a 2008 survey.  

Barbara Annis said the way the section is written is correct as of now however it may change in future for the Exit 7 and 9 areas. She agreed that Warner does favor putting conditions on designs and performance standards.

Vanessa Goold asked if Barbara Annis would like a more long term vision discussed in the section or should it wait until the Planning Board is finished discussing the possible changes. Barbara Annis said they are just in the beginning stages so it would be better to wait.  

The Board agreed the current verbiage still fits with the vision of Town of Warner .  

In the Residential Development section of the Chapter it was agreed to add some verbiage about Workforce Housing Overlay.  

Vanessa will Draft a new copy with the Workforce Housing Overlay information and forward it to the Board for review.  

B. Future Land Use Chapter  

Vanessa Goold said her two goals for the night were to:

1. Develop a Future Land Use Map that would express the Board’s and the  

     Community’s desire for future land use.

2. Recommendations for future land use in each of the categories identified in the map.  

Vanessa Goold invited the Board and the Public to look at three maps (future land use map created 10 years ago, current zoning map, and a topographical map of Warner to create a new future land use map to incorporate into the Master Plan.  

After discussing and review of the maps it was agreed to use the existing Future Land Use Map from ten years ago with a few changes. It will now show a larger commercial zone in the Davisville area and a couple of lines were adjusted in other areas. The Board agreed to keep the categories the same as before (low/medium/high density).  

The Board agreed the addition of a special agricultural District was not necessary.  

Vanessa Goold said she wanted to come up with some recommendations in each of the categories for the Future Land Use Chapter describing the map. She said since the map was more or less the same she could draft in what was  in the previous Master Plan as well as a discussion about the small changes made at this meeting. She will send the information to the Board for their review before the October 18, 2010 meeting.  

Vanessa Goold will be returning on October 18, 2010 to discuss the Future Land Use Chapter, The Natural Resource Chapter and the Energy Chapter of the Master Plan.  

Vanessa Goold also asked if the Board would like to include a Community Facilities Chapter in this Master Plan. Ed Mical confirmed the Chapter was in the last Master Plan. Barbara Annis asked Vanessa Goold to let them know the cost of the additional chapter, before September 27, 2010 , so it can be added to the budget. The Board agreed they would like to see the Chapter included in this Master Plan especially since this Chapter can be used as a tool for the CIP.  

Vanessa Goold thanked the Board and left the meeting.  

The Board thanked Nancy Ladd and Jim McLaughlin for their input.  

5. CONTINUED CIP DISCUSSION  

After a brief discussion the Board agreed that Paul Violette would compose the Planning Board comments to be placed in the CIP.  

6. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS  

A. CDPC (Commercial District Planning Committee)  

J.D. Colcord said the committee felt the Davisville area is probably the best area to make changes in for this year. They want to keep everything simple and easy for the voters to understand their recommendations. J.D. Colcord said most of the area is already commercial as well as a gravel pit so it makes the most sense to expand the Commercial District in that area.

Paul Violette said they were also looking at two other items:

1. Modifying building footprints

2. Signs in specific districts.  

The committee will be discussing their finds at the September 20, 2010 Planning Board Work Session meeting.  

Barbara Annis asked if they had discussed multiple buildings on one lot. Paul Violette said yes they have.  

Paul Violette said they have mainly been concentrating on the C-1 District in Davisville.  

J.D. Colcord asked if the Board would like them to continue with their research of the possible expansion of the Davisville area. The Board agreed they would like the committee to continue with the research.  

J.D. Colcord said they will come back with a recommendation regarding height, impervious surfaces, etc.  

B.   SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE  

Barbara Annis said the committee has not been able to meet due to Ed Mical working on the CIP. They are planning on getting together in the near future.      

C. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE  

The RFP/RFQ deadline is September 20, 2010 . So far only one company has contacted the Planning Board regarding the Exit 9 area.                     

D. SELECTMAN’S REPORT  

David Hartman said at a recent Selectmen’s meeting it was noted that some committees were meeting at non-public venues instead of at the Town Hall, Library or other public area. He said if there is a reasonable reason for not meeting at the Town Hall that would be okay but it is preferred that the committees meet at a pubic venue such as the Town Hall.  

There were some further negotiations for the acquisition of land for the fire station.  

A court date has been set for May 2011 to hear the case regarding the Azmy property.  

David Hartman said the East Roby Road project is currently underway. He said the money is being expended from a Capital Reserve Fund. The repair will be done within the budget at a lesser amount then originally proposed. David Hartman said the savings comes from not having to do river work. All the work has been able to be kept on shore.  

9. PUBLIC COMMENTS  

No public was present.  

10. ADJOURN  

Peter Wyman made a MOTION to ADJOURN. J.D. Colcord seconded the motion and all were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 .