Warner Board of Selectmen
Meeting Minutes
March 6, 2007
Meeting opened at 6:00 p.m.
In Attendance: Selectman David E. Hartman - Chairman
Selectman Wayne Eigabroadt, Selectman Richard A. Cook
Absent: No Members Absent
Others Present: Laura Buono – Town Administrator
Barbara Annis, Mark Lennon, Martha Mical, Allan N.
Brown, Ray Martin, Judith Rogers, Anthony Mento
1. PLANNING BOARD
Planning Board members Barbara Annis and Mark Lennon
met with the Selectmen. Barbara Annis sent a memo to the Selectmen
asking if the Planning Board would be able to withdraw money from the
Traffic Light Capital Reserve Fund (exit 9) for engineering studies. The
Selectmen agreed that the engineering is a step toward the installation
of a traffic light which would warrant funding from the established
reserve. A request for funds would need to be submitted to the Trustees
of Trust Funds.
Barbara requested to enter into non-public session to
discuss a legal matter that the Planning Board is facing. Laura asked if
the Planning Board has received written legal notice. Barbara said yes.
Selectman Cook made the motion that the Board of Selectmen enter into
Nonpublic Session pursuant to RSA 91-A: 3 II (e). Selectman
Eigabroadt seconded the motion. Roll Call: Chairman Hartman, Aye;
Selectman Eigabroadt, Aye; Selectman Cook, Aye. Motion passed
unanimously. (The following is included here in that it was
determined later, see motion next page, that the subject matter did not
warrant nonpublic).
Barbara explained that there have been some problems
within the Planning Board office. Barbara has been familiar with RSA
673:16.
673:16 Staff; Finances. –
I. Each local land use board may appoint such
employees as it deems necessary for its work who shall be subject to the
same employment rules as other corresponding civil employees of the
municipality. Each board may also contract with planners, engineers,
architects, and other consultants for such services as it may require.
The expenditures of the board, exclusive of gifts, reimbursements, or
amounts held pursuant to paragraph II, shall be within the amounts
appropriated for the purpose by the local legislative body, which may
provide such funds, equipment, and accommodations as it deems necessary
or advisable for the board's work. Each board may accept and use gifts,
grants, or contributions for the exercise of its functions, in
accordance with procedures established for the expenditure of funds
within the municipality.
II. Any fee which a local land use board, acting
pursuant to this title, collects from an applicant to cover an expense
lawfully imposed upon that applicant, including but not limited to the
expense of notice, the expense of consultant services or investigative
studies under RSA 676:4, I(g), or the implementation of conditions
lawfully imposed as part of a conditional approval, may be paid out
toward that expense without approval of the local legislative body. Such
fees:
(a) Shall, whenever held by the
municipality, be placed in the custody of the municipal treasurer,
subject to the same investment limitations as for other municipal funds.
(b) Shall be paid out only for the
purpose for which the expense was imposed upon the applicant.
(c) Shall be held in a separate,
nonlapsing account, and not commingled with other municipal funds;
provided, however, that such fees may be used to reimburse any account
from which an amount has been paid out in anticipation of the receipt of
said fees.
(d) Shall be paid out by the
municipal treasurer only upon order of the local land use board or its
designated agent for such purpose. This paragraph shall not apply to
application, permit, or inspection fees which have been set by the local
legislative body as part of an ordinance, or by the selectmen under RSA
41:9-a. Notwithstanding RSA 672:7, a building inspector shall not be
considered a "local land use board'' for purposes of this section.
Barbara continued by saying RSA 673:16 was never
pursued because the working relationship between the Selectmen’s
office and the Planning Board office has been "good". Barbara
referred to RSA 673:16 section I and had requested a legal
interpretation from Local Government Center. Barbara spoke with a legal
rep from LGC that said yes, the employee works for the Planning Board
not the Selectmen’s office. Laura asked if the Town is being sued in
any way, if not, this Nonpublic is not valid; this would be a public
conversation. Barbara said that the Town Administrator issued a new job
description for the Planning Board secretary. The Planning Board
secretary currently reports to Laura, the RSA states that the PB
secretary should be reporting to the Planning Board Chair.
Selectman Cook made the motion to come out of
Nonpublic session because the topic of discussion has been determined
not valid for Nonpublic. Selectman Eigabroadt seconded the motion.
Roll Call: Chairman Hartman, Aye; Selectman Eigabroadt, Aye; Selectman
Cook, Aye. Motion passed unanimously.
Chairman Hartman reiterated that a new job
description has been written to meet the needs of today so that a new
employee would be hired and shared between the Planning and Zoning
Board. The job description has the secretarial position reporting to the
Town Administrator which was based on an organizational flow chart. The
flow chart lists all the secretarial positions were under the Town
Administrator. Selectman Eigabroadt added that the organizational flow
chart is deceiving from that standpoint because technically as employees
the secretaries fall under the Town Administrator, but according to
statute the Land Use secretary takes direction from the chairs of both
the Planning & Zoning Board. Laura agreed, and said she has tried on
several occasions to meet with Barbara. Barbara explained that Town
Counsel said the Board of Selectmen are the decision makers and she
should not discuss this matter with the Town Administrator until after
she has received a decision from the Board of Selectmen. Laura added
that by speaking with her about Barbara’s concerns first saves time
and money. Money could have been saved simply by communicating rather
than obtaining legal opinion and avoiding the Town Administrator.
Barbara agreed that she has avoided the Town Administrator. Chairman
Hartman concluded that there has been an effort on the Town
Administrator’s part to meet with Barbara. Barbara explained that on
one occasion she did meet with Laura who was very accommodating
regarding a problem with the Land Use secretary which Laura resolved.
Barbara continued that unbeknownst to the Planning Board, the secretary’s
job description was changed. Laura disagreed with Barbara’s statement,
and said that during the interview process for the position a copy of
the job description was given to both the Planning and Zoning Chairs.
Barbara claims that she has never seen the current job description and
added that there are no dates or revision dates visible on the job
description. Barbara claims that if she had seen the job description she
wouldn’t have gone through all the "hell" that she has gone
through since last November. Chairman Hartman asked Barbara if she
participated in the interview/selection process for the secretary.
Barbara said she had participated in the interview process but holds
claim that she did not have a job description. Barbara thought the job
description was the same from the wage study and had no reason to
believe it would be changed because it was working. Chairman Hartman
asked Laura if there was a chance that Barbara was not shown the job
description. Laura explained that both Chairs had a copy of the job
description during the interview process as well as the individuals that
were interviewed. Laura added that she and Barbara had several
discussions during the update of the job description and does not
understand how Barbara can say she had no idea. Again, Barbara added
that if she had seen the new job description then why would she put
herself through "hell" for three months. Barbara continued by
saying that she specifically asked the Land Use secretary to see the
Town Clerk about the zoning ballot and warrant. Barbara returned the
following week and followed up on her request finding out that the
secretary did not see the Town Clerk because the Town Administrator said
not to. Laura said that was not quite what happened and then said that
this conversation is bordering nonpublic parameters. Laura again said
she has been waiting to speak with Barbara but has experienced
resistance on Barbara’s part. Barbara explained that up until she read
the job description she did not understand that the secretary reports to
the Town Administrator, after learning that, Barbara sought advisement
from the Local Government Center learning that the Land Use secretary
takes direction from the Chairs. LGC also advised that if there should
be a civil litigation she should seek advisement from Town Counsel.
Chairman Hartman read into the record a response to Barbara from Town
Counsel, February 13, 2007:
Barbara,
The two situations you present – regarding the
zoning ballot responsibilities, and the direction of Board employees –
are both affected by overlapping responsibilities of the Board and the
Town administration.
The Planning Board’s responsibilities are covered
by RSA 675:3, Sections I – IV. Once the public hearing process has
been concluded by the board, the responsibilities for disseminating the
final zoning ordinance proposals and preparing the ballot shift to the
Town administration and the Town Clerk. Literally, the Board is not in
violation of RSA 675:3,V because the torch has been passed to the Town
Administrator and the Town Clerk. That is not to say that there is no
need for concern: it is important that all publication of the proposals
and their presentation on the ballot needs to be timely and correct to
effect the changes in compliance with the requirements of RSA 675 and
validly amend the Ordinance.
Similarly, RSA 673:16 makes the Board the appointing
authority of your staff employees, who thereby become employees of the
Town subject to all the budgetary and employment terms and conditions to
which other Town employees are subject. It seems to me that the duties
and job performance of the Board responsibilities delegated to the
Board-appointed employee are under your control, while the general
responsibilities of Town Employees are the province of the Town
administration. To be effective the job description needs to make it
clear that the primary responsibilities are to the Board to fulfill and
support the Board in its role as defined by the Statutes.
Laura added that communication could have cleared a
lot of this up. Both Laura and Barbara have a meeting scheduled for
10:00 a.m. on March 7, 2007. This meeting was arranged a week ago. The
Selectmen agreed that communication needs to take place between Barbara
and the Town Administrator.
Selectman Cook had a question regarding a different
subject. During the March 6th Planning Board meeting the need
to survey a complete lot in order to subdivide was discussed. Selectman
Cook added that for many years it was the Town policy to have a complete
survey of a lot in order to subdivide. Selectman Cook asked when did the
policy change. Mark Lennon said that since he has been on the Planning
Board the Board has never asked for a survey of a compete lot. Barbara
added that as long as there is a definite bound from which you could
determine. Selectman Cook said that was not always the policy and there
should be a recommendation to change the policy because a number of
people, he included, were required to survey entire pieces of property
in order to subdivide. Selectman Cook does not recall the existing
policy being changed. It’s important to maintain consistency. Martha
Mical believes that property owners have asked for a waiver in surveying
entire lots. Selectman Cook understands that in the past it was policy
and now from the March 6th discussion it is no longer a
policy.
2. TOWN MEETING – ROAD PROJECTS
Allan N. Brown met with the Selectmen to discuss
presentations at Town Meeting. There is a $200,000 warrant for road
construction being presented to the voters. There is also a Road
Committee working on establishing a list of roads that will need repair
but won’t be ready for presentation until 2008. Allan has in the past
generated his own list of roads and feels that the $200,000 should be
utilized to repair at least one road this year. Selectman Cook added
that some of the road construction fund will be needed to match FEMA
funding. Allan recommends that since FEMA money will be spent on Horne/Newmarket
the Town should spend money and repair some of Newmarket at the same
time. The project could be contracted as a whole. Or, Allan added, an
extension could be submitted to FEMA allowing the Town to use all the
road construction fund money on Waldron Hill. Selectman Cook verified
that the Horne St. project would not need funding from the road
construction fund, the match has been budgeted, also it was discussed
that the road construction fund would be used for preliminary
engineering from the results of the Road Committee in order to present a
cost in 2008. Selectman Cook asked what would be accomplished on
Newmarket. Allan explained that 1000’ of Newmarket and 1000’ of
Horne, on the side of caution up to 1500’ of Newmarket up to the edge
of the beaver dam. Laura added that the Newmarket project has been
discussed the most through the budget process. The budget will be
absorbing the small projects; the Newmarket project incorporates a Town
project and a FEMA project. Engineering on the Horne/Newmarket has been
completed. Selectman Cook asked Allan how much funding should be set
aside for engineering. Chairman Hartman recommends earmarking $50,000
for engineering and the balance of the$200,000 would be used for road
construction. Selectman Cook asked where the funding would come from for
the engineering at Connors Mill. Allan explained the engineering would
be paid from FEMA and State. Allan recommends negotiating the Newmarket
project similar to Mill Street, the Town would supply the gravel and
paving would be paid through the paving line. Selectman Cook summarized
that the road construction fund would be used as such; $35,000 for
preliminary engineering and the balance of $165,000 would be for 1000’
– 1500’ Newmarket and 1000’ for Horne Street combined with FEMA
funding.
Selectmen Eigabroadt received a complaint regarding
snowmobiles crossing over Brown Road leaving bumps in the road. Allan
agreed that the road crew will keep an eye on the road and address the
bumps as they occur in the travel portion of the road.
Selectman Cook confirmed that Allan would be
available at Town Meeting to speak about Article 26, discontinuing a
portion of Old Davisville Road and the process on how it came to this
point. Allan recommended reverting the property back on the basis that
the two parties involved pay the costs, if both parties do not agree the
property is not reverted.
Allan will also speak on behalf of a new loader for
the Highway Department.
3. MODERATOR – TOWN MEETING
Ray Martin and the Selectmen reviewed the agenda and
speakers for the Town Meeting. A memo will be sent to the Department
Heads requiring their presence at the Town Meeting.
4. ZONING BOARD & 911
Martha Mical, Zoning Board Vice Chair requested that
the Board of Selectmen temporarily appoint 2 prior members for the March
21, 2007 Zoning Board. Currently there is one vacancy; one member must
recuse themselves on a case, one member that will be absent and one
member that is an unknown. Martha has contacted some previous members
and from that contact 2 said that they would serve. Laura contacted
Local Government Center and was advised to fill the vacancy. LGC did not
recommend appointing a person for the sake of this one case, but
recommended appointing more alternates in order to avoid this situation.
Selectman Eigabroadt made the motion to appoint Ken Klinedinst as a
full member of the Zoning Board expiring April 1, 2007. Selectman
Cook seconded the motion. A vote was taken, motion passed unanimously.
Selectman Eigabroadt made the motion to appoint Ted Young as an
alternate member to the Zoning Board for a three year term.
Selectman Cook seconded the motion. A vote was taken, motion passed
unanimously.
Martha explained that an application for abatement
was received by facsimile (deadline March 1) on March 1 incomplete. The
original document was received by Martha on March 6, 2007. Martha asked
the Selectmen if the abatement should be accepted. Anthony Mento asked
if the facsimile could be considered as a letter of intent to be
followed with the completed application. Selectman Cook agreed with the
intent. Selectman Cook made the motion to forward the abatement
application for Map 37 Lot 17 to the Assessors. Selectman Eigabroadt
seconded the motion. A vote was taken, motion passed unanimously.
Martha informed the Selectmen that a case (not
indicated) that was to be heard by the Board of Tax and Land Appeals has
withdrawn.
Regarding 911, Martha forwarded a letter from the
Police Chief to the Selectmen. Selectman Cook recommends not changing
road names, but some of the numbering could be changed. The Selectman
reviewed the 911 list and indicated their recommendations.
Martha asked why the final version that she submitted
for the Town Report was changed after print. The zeros were removed from
the original report. The Town Clerk also noted that the total in her
report is different which indicates that she did not balance with the
Treasurer when in fact they do balance.
5. ODD FELLOWS BUILDING COMMITTEE – MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING
Anthony Mento, OFBC member, met with the Selectmen to
take the MOU to Tom Brennan Kearsarge Regional School District
Superintendent. The Selectmen reviewed the document and Chairman Hartman
signed the MOU. Anthony explained that the MOU has been reviewed by the
Moore’s and they have agreed to it, the School Board has allowed Mr.
Brennan to sign the MOU. Anthony asked if the OFBC could speak on behalf
of the progress at Town Meeting.
6. BARN PRESERVATION
Selectman Cook recommends adopting a policy before
taking any action. Chairman Hartman added before the Selectmen adopt the
policy he would like to present to the Town a warrant article asking
whether or not the Town wishes to participate in the barn preservation
easement program. Selectman Cook added that there is currently a request
before the Selectmen but in order to deal with the request the law
states the assessed value cannot be a arbitrary choice made by a
governing body but one that is based on some recognized method of
assessment. To deal with this correctly the Town needs to have a
policy. Selectman Cook will create a policy using information from
Lyndeborough and Moultonborough for the Board to review. The Selectmen
will address the request before them; further applications will remain
on hold until the Town addresses a warrant article in 2008.
7. ADMINISTRATORS REPORT
Mill Street – The Water Precinct understood
that the Town was going to pay for the entire cost of engineering the
Mill Street project however, when the invoices came in, Laura sent a
portion of the invoices to the Precinct. In reviewing meeting minutes
with regard to the subject, it was suggested by Allan Brown that the
Precinct pay a portion of the costs involved. Currently, the Precinct
owes a total of approximately $16,000.00 that needs to be paid and if
they will be required to pay it, they will have to add money into their
budget on March 20th to cover the cost. Selectman Eigabroadt
said that the original cost estimate should show a breakdown of the
engineering costs.
Junk Yards – Chairman Hartman, Selectman
Eigabroadt and Laura will be attending training on Monday, March 19th
with regard to new regulations surrounding motor vehicle salvage yards.
Currently, DES considers one of the two properties which the Town
licenses as a "junk yard" as an auto graveyard. According to
DES, there aren’t any outstanding violations on the State level due to
this classification. DES has sent him letters with regard to the safe
handling of fluids, etc. Laura has given each of the Selectmen a copy of
RSA 236:111 through 236:129 for review. These sheets were handed out at
a workshop last year with regard to Motor Vehicle Recycling Yards and
Junk Yards.
Memo of Understanding Central Parking Facility
– The MOU with regard to the central parking facility had been updated
and emailed to the Board on 2/26/07. Unless there are any concerns, Mr.
Closs would like to get this signed and moved forward.
Simonds School – At the last Selectmen’s
Meeting Laura brought up a letter that was received from Judith
Pellettieri with regard to a request for money from the Bartlett Fund.
She is requesting $800 to attend the Vermont Symphony Orchestra’s
performance of "Create". The Board asked to look into whether
or not New London is attending the performance however; Simond’s is
not aware of New London’s plans but are not included in the $800
requested. Selectman Cook made the motion to approve the expenditure
of $800 from the Bartlett Fund to pay for the Simonds school children to
attend Vermont Symphony Orchestra’s performance of "Create".
Chairman Hartman seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Volunteers – Several volunteer forms have
come in from individuals who wish to be appointed to various committees.
Forms will be available on Election Day and Town Meeting in hopes that
more interested parties will fill them out.
Land Summit Conference – Paperwork was
received with regard to topics of growth, development and land
conservation from the Ausbon Sargent Land Preservation Trust. The Trust
is requesting that the Board choose up to 5 topics from the list
provided for possible discussions to take place at their summit in
October.
Laura and the Selectmen discussed the importance of
encouraging communication with the administrator’s office.
8. CAPITAL AREA HEALTH NETWORK
The Selectmen will review a MOU extension up to
December 2007.
9. MEETING MINUTES
Selectman Eigabroadt made the motion to approve
February 6 meeting minutes, February 20 meeting minutes and February 20
joint board meeting as corrected. Selectman Cook seconded the
motion. Motion passed unanimously.
10. GENERAL BUSINESS
Selectman Cook asked about the status of an audit.
Laura is obtaining quotes.
11. NONPUBLIC SESSION
Selectman Cook made the motion that the Board of
Selectmen enter into Nonpublic Session pursuant to RSA 91-A: 3 II (a
& c). Selectman Eigabroadt seconded the motion. Roll Call: Chairman
Hartman, Aye; Selectman Eigabroadt, Aye; Selectman Cook, Aye. Motion
passed unanimously.
Selectman Eigabroadt made the motion to come out of
Nonpublic session. Selectman Cook seconded the motion. Roll Call:
Chairman Hartman, Aye; Selectman Eigabroadt, Aye; Selectman Cook, Aye.
Motion passed unanimously.
Selectman Cook made the motion to seal the Nonpublic
session. Chairman Hartman seconded the motion. Roll call: Chairman
Hartman, Aye; Selectman Cook, Aye; Selectman Eigabroadt opposed. The
motion passed.
Motion to adjourn 10:24 p.m.
Board of Selectmen
David E. Hartman – Chairman
Wayne Eigabroadt
Richard A. Cook
|